Of course, there is a
humanitarian crisis in Gaza, as the Israeli army tries to stop the daily indiscriminate firing of dozens of rockets at their civilians by Hamas. And Israel could do more to avoid genuine civilian targets, though the size of Gaza and the nature of its military make civilian casualties inevitable. And, of course, a ceasefire is urgently needed. But, as Tony Blair
pointed out this morning, a ceasefire can only come when there is a verifiable end to those rockets, and arms shipments through tunnels from Egypt to Hamas, as well as an end to Israeli military action in Gaza.
Not that this would be terribly clear in some reporting on British television about events in the region.
Channel 4 News makes little effort to hide its contempt for Israel: last night Sarah Smith was even given time to show how she was already falling out of love with Barack Obama because he failed to condemn Israel (given that he had made
his views pretty clear during the election campaign, as even Smith acknowledged, why should this be a surprise?)
1 comment:
People in Gaza are suffering, but will they be better off with Hamaz in power? Hamaz approved the Sharia law in Palestine including punishment by crucifiction and amputation and death penalty for "weakining the spirit of Plestinian people", as reported in Al Hayat and other Arabic newspapers. Wouldn't the Gazans be better if they just make peace with Israel and stop being hostages of Iran?
Post a Comment