data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09beb/09bebb48964945582932fbb24275c96a98b435bc" alt=""
BAFTA may have
got it right with best actress for Julie Walters as
Mo and recognition for
Mad Men and
The Thick of It. But what could have possessed them to award Kenneth Branagh Best Actor for his simpering, unreal portrayal of Kurt
Wallender? (There are many other series in which Branagh has been superb, just not this one). Don't the Academy know that there is only one actor who captures Mankel's brilliant Swedish detective perfectly - and that is Krister Henriksson (left), who has played the part in the Swedish series that is infinitely better than the BBC version. Thanks to
BBC 4, we know this. Why doesn't BAFTA?
1 comment:
That is simply right. I would go further in that I've never liked Kenneth Branagh as an actor - in anything. Somebody else could probably explain it better, but I always feel that I am watching somebody act very well. With greater actors I feel that I am watching the actual character.
Post a Comment