In Ofsted reports of all primary schools between 2003 and 2005, 60% of Catholic primary schools were judged to have an excellent or very good ethos, compared to
45% of other schools, while 49% of Catholic secondary schools were judged to have an excellent or very good ethos, compared to 32% of other schools.
They were a great vehicle for social mobility and helped many young people to escape the relative poverty of their parents. It is for that reason that I support faith schools for other communities, such as Sikhs, Jews and Muslims, and provided the right safeguards are in place to guard against extremists and ensure a balanced curriculum, I favour their expansion where there is genuine parental demand. But it is not for government to create this demand - which is why Ed Balls was right to answer as he did at the Select Committee (whose chairman is not a fan of faith schools) - but is for government to respond to that demand where it can reasonably be met. A Labour government should be proud that it created the first state schools for faiths other than Christians and Jews. It should not be unwilling to continue to do so.
1 comment:
We (Netherlands) have known a 20th century dominated by what is called a 'pillaring' of society into faith-based groups. The consequence has been social division (except at the top level) but also a politisation of education which has had quite unwelcome side-effects.
It is also very difficult to safeguard against sectarianism (and hence radicalisation and extremism) when that is what faith-based schools are about: segregating people on the basis of one common character.
I am not necessarily arguing against giving religion a place in education, mind you, but you might want to look at the role that faith-based schools have played in other countries - because once you let the cat out of the bag, it's bloody difficult getting him in again.
Post a Comment